6.22.2013

I made a critical error in judgement today. Only my relative poverty is preventing a stumble into the German fantasy world of cameras.

Cigarettes are totally addictive and the best way to avoid addiction is to never pick up the habit in the first place.....and now the Leica story.

A few days ago I wrote a blog about the new Leica X vario. While I waffled a bit and admitted that the camera may have some appeal to a tiny demographic I was, for the most part, dismissive of the value proposition. The camera looked pretty cool but the slow lens wasn't sexy and the lack of a built in EVF gave me pause (as it always seems to do..). I could have spent the rest of my life never thinking about it again and the impact of the void would never even amounted to a blip on my gear lust radar.

But that was before I went searching for a ten dollar part with which to fix a six hundred dollar flash. I hadn't been in my favorite camera store in a while so I did a fearsome amount of looking around and self-directed tire kicking. I considered a new monopod and rejected it. I considered a really enormous and rock solid $1800 video tripod but in the end its lack of portability kept my credit card in cold storage. So after a hard target search of the entire inventory I headed toward a friendly and professional sales person to make my meager purchase. As I stood on one side of the glass case and, Ron, my sales guide and camera crack dealer stood on the other side and worked the controls on the cash register, my eyes wandered behind him and came to rest on the Leica display. 

Now, the new Leica X Vario was just announced a little more than a week ago so I thought that accessible inventory would be months away, but there on the shelf was the latest toy in its dark, dark gray finish. I should have turned my head and looked at cheap video sliders instead but in the moment that I hesitated Ron could sense my weakness and he pounced like a mongoose on a dizzy cobra. Yes. He handed me the camera.  And that was all it really took. Now I am in love.

I won't go into details. I haven't bought one yet. I haven't even committed to buying one, but on the way home I was looking for refundable soda bottles beside the road and when I got home I started looking behind the couch and chair cushions on the outside chance that someone's $2700 pocket change had fallen out of their pockets and come to rest, sub-cushion. The camera is that seductive.

It's much more beautiful than these photographs might indicate. The body style is right in line with the "M" tradition and the heft and balance of the body are remarkably seductive. I didn't want to let it go back on the shelf. I started snapping images and the shutter had the old Leica snicking authority combined with enough body mass to dampen any kinetic effect of shutter travel or acceleration/deceleration. 

Do you remember the movie, "Wayne's World"? In it Wayne (played by a younger and more talented Mike Meyers) is smitten by a Stratocaster guitar at a local music shop. Each week he stops by to look it over and play it. His mantra is, "It will be mine. Oh yes, it will be mine."  Substitute the Leica for the Stratocaster and I'm right there with Wayne Campbell. "It will be mine. Oh yes, it will be mine." It's so nice I'm not even sure I care if the files are great. Really good will be enough.  The flesh is weak. My only question is whether or not the Olympus VF-4 will work in the EVF plug.....

Warning: If you love beautifully crafted cameras (way beyond the Fujis, Nikons and Canons) and you don't want to impoverish yourself, don't ever handle the camera. It must be coated with heroin, dusted with nicotine, and finished off with a bit of Xanax. Addictive and dangerous.


A small victory against the engineering stupidity of the new Sony flash system. Dammit.

Some proprietary designs are just chicken poop.

Hey there! Do you own a Canon or Nikon camera and use it, along with the same brand's flash units to make lots and lots of flash lit images? Are you happy with the way your flash and camera work together? Can you use all the different radio triggers out there with a minimum of cussing and pulling your hair out??? If you answered "yes" then do yourself a big favor and don't switch to Sony's new a99, a58 or Nex 6, especially if you were also planning to buy the Sony HVL 60 flash unit. Uh Oh! is Kirk getting ready to dump his Sony cameras and look elsewhere?

Well, no. I think the a99 is the best camera I've shot with in the entire realm of digital but I think that whoever is in charge of the product category of Sony flashes should be required to come to the house of every system owner of cameras using the new flash interface (the one that should have a trigger contact right in the same place every other flash in the universe does) and personally retrofit their flashes with either a new shoe that makes the cameras work with my Flash Waves triggers or your Pocket Wizard triggers.  Now.

Here's my short list of Sony screw ups with flash: 1. I liked the old Minolta shoe and people made converters for them. It's bad marketing to have two concurrent shoe standards. Especially when neither one of them is "standard." 2. The new flashes (HVL 60) have put the firing pin for the flash at some random position where it fires almost no third party radio trigger. Work arounds include taking a hacksaw to your flash trigger. 3. I've tried to figure out the flash menu to be able to use the HVL 60 as a master (on camera) to trigger an HVL 58, and vice versa, with no luck whatsoever even though I've read every tutorial on the world wide web.  4. Sony doesn't make an off camera cord for their new flashes and cameras. And guess what? Neither does anyone else. It's simple, simple, simple engineering. Dear God, someone please step up and make a connection cord. And yes, I've finally found out that the newest $600 flash will shut down if you shoot it more than once or twice a minute.

My biggest desire was to be able either use my HVL 58 flash or my (new non-standard connection) HVL 60 on my very nice and tiny Flash Waves radio triggers. The trigger fits on the a99, the a58 etc. just fine, and it sees trigger current and triggers the sender. The problem is that the HVL 60 doesn't sit far enough in to the shoe on the receiver to make contact with the center pin. The problem with the HVL 58 is the none standard foot with NO center pin. I despaired. 

Now, most of the time I'm using the camera with the studio flashes and have no problem using the triggers for that. When I'm not using the studio flashes I'm probably using a fluorescent or an LED panel and those are so wonderful that no sync connection is even needed. But I'm doing a job out of town on Monday and I wanted to travel light, light like I did in the Nikon days when I'd stuff a bunch of SB-800's in a Airport Security case and pop a Nikon flash controller in the hot shoe and shoot all day. Four flashes, in umbrellas and never a misfire. Later I used Canon and I used them all in ratio'd manual with radio triggers and I was fine with that. I wanted to do the same thing here with the Sony gear. 

So, I sat in my studio with Gary Friedman's e-book and two $600 flashes and every adapter known to man except the ones I'd need to make my flashes work. But, ever optimistic, I saddled up and went up the road to Precision-Camera.com and started looking around. And then I found my work around. It's a small adapter that interfaces with the old Minolta style flash shoe on one side and gives you a dumb (but live and centered) center pin/standard flash foot on the other side. I bought two. One goes straight on the HVL 58's Minolta foot and when I attach it to the radio slave everything is jake. The "marvelous" new HVL 60 requires me to use two adapters. One converts the new non-standard standard shoe to the older totally non-standard Minolta foot type. The second one is the same adapter I talked about above which interfaces with the Minolta-type shoe interface and then gives me a standard flash foot with a centered firing contact on the other end. Now, with two cheap adapters cobbled together I can get fully manual flash out of my $600 flash. Amazingly droll. I could have done this much more elegantly 30 years ago with a Vivitar 283 flash. And those babies never shut down for heat unless they smoked and gave up the ghost permanently. 

I guess this kind of stupidity is what happens when a hapless giant blunders into the world of photography without a second thought for the professional who might want to use their stuff. Thank goodness for whatever enterprising manufacturer who decided to make and market a $10 device to save a $600 marketing nightmare. 

Now forgive me for my tantrum but I'm off to immerse myself in Gary's instructions with both cameras and flashes in front of me on my desk. I'm practicing my boxing in case I ever see the day when I meet the Sony "flash team." But I'm sure, given the feedback Sony has no doubt gotten on these issues that the whole team is probably busy practicing to be more successful at their new jobs, which probably entails learning to ask, "Do you want fries with that?"

Final point: Every flash maker with a unit that retails for more than $400 should be required to put a standard PC socket somewhere on the flash unit. That would have solved half the problem right out of the box.... 

Taking the Medicine.

I have to confess something a little embarrassing.  I only showed a real portfolio a couple of times last year and now I'm paying for it.

Can you really blame me?  I mean I had one really cool client who sent me to cool places like West Palm Beach for week long shoots.  I did lot of work on a continuing basis for a great industrial giant and also for several top designers and ad agencies.  
How was I to know everyone I worked with would fold their cards and leave the table when slapped in the face by the nastiest economic downturn since 1929?  Like everyone else I figured it would get ugly for a few months and then everything would get all better like last time.  Boy was I wrong.  It's like people dived underwater to look at something interesting in the stream and the monster from the black lagoon ate em.  So here I am doing what I should have been doing all along instead of being rather smug and self involved about writing books.  I've actually put together a new portfolio and headed out into the world to show it.

But since I am a contrarian I am doing it all "wrong".  Instead of presenting a titanium skeleton portfolio case, inlaid with adamantium and  covered with rare gemstones and finger painting, along with branded leather trim, I'm putting a bunch of loose prints in an anonymous, black clamshell case.  And, horrors, the prints are NOT painfully extracted from a giant ink sucking desktop "giclee  (ha. ha. how pretensious) inkjet printer, they all came from Costco.

But my biggest contrarian contribution comes in quantity (and alliteration....).  The old screed commanded photographers to only show no more than 20 of your best images.  Bound.  Under Swiss plastic covers. But I shoved about 50 big prints (12x18 inches) into the case and, if my first two portfolio showings are any indicator, the audience is hungry for depth.  I showed 20. They devoured them and asked for more.  I showed another 20 and that only made the room full of art directors and creative people more desperate.  I tossed out the last ten and felt like the host of a ripping party who'd just opened his last bottle of wine  as more beautiful people sauntered thru the front door, thirsty.

So my portfolio show lasted 45 minutes.  And in those 45 minutes I made two more mistakes.  I showed medical images, portraits and food.  And I almost skipped showing the food because I'd read one of those "all knowing" books from the 1990's that insisted clients are only smart enough to peg you to one subject matter.  Well, nobody at the agency got the memo because, guess what?  They do healthcare and food.  And they liked both.

Long version short.  I booked a few jobs from the first three showings (I'm batting 66%) and got some nice, vague promises for future stuff.  I'm out taking my medicine and my own advice and pretty gratified that it's working.  I guess I do need to leave the comfortable confines of my house and the neighborhood coffee house from time to time.

The economy is bad but you'll make it worse if you buy into the idea that a website takes the place of a face to face meeting.  You'll make it stink if you think a Facebook page replaces the real social networking of lunch.  And you're business will probably be on life support if you think that everything revolves around how fast you can type on your blackberry.  I've just found out for the millionth time the power of human interaction.  And it really only happens face to face.  Take your medicine and get out there.


6.21.2013

How am I shooting now? What's changed in the past few years? Months?

hardly looks like hydrogen to me...

I'm nothing if not flexible in my adaptation to new toys and tools in my business and hobby. For years I worked mostly with big Nikon and Canon cameras and I would buy "point and shoot" compact digital cameras for fun shooting, or in situations where the image was secondary to the actual experience. I bought into that paradigm for the same reason we all do; it was the prevailing thought structure for photographers, reinforced by advertising and group reinforcement. A perpetual motion machine, stuck in place by its own inertia and centrifugal force. For me the walls of the construct began to change with the introduction of really convincing point and shoot digitals like the Canon G10 (which I sorely regret selling a few years back), and various, similar cameras like the Panasonic LX-5. I even went through a dalliance with long zoom range bridge cameras and my equipment cabinet was littered with Canon SX20's, 30's and 40's until Ben and his friends sacrificed a number of them to the vagaries of kinetic video production or random skate boarding accidents. We still have one or two hanging around for "high risk" situations...

But the cameras that broke the big camera hegemony for me were the second generation of Olympus Pen micro 4:3rds cameras and their subsequent Panasonic cousins. With the Olympus EP-2, and later, the EP-3 I experienced comparable image quality (compared to my previous bigger cameras, not exactly to contemporary big cameras) which allowed me to embrace the smaller cameras and do work that was very satisfying for me. The proof of value for me of the new, small system cameras became evident on a spur of the moment trip I took to Marfa, Texas (and points west) in the Spring of 2010. On that adventure I took only EP-2 and EPL cameras and assorted lenses. My images were everything I'd hoped they would be and the 12 megapixel files were fine and dandy for prints up to 15 by 15 inches. (Go print something from a small frame camera like a Sony RX100 or a Nikon V1 and you'll likely end up questioning your previous cache of beliefs about quality and camera cost/size equations. Really).

As of the beginning of this year I had only one remaining prejudice/long held belief/precept of faith and that was the firm and tenacious religiously held belief that I could not and would not use a camera that had no eye level viewfinder. Just wouldn't do it. Interesting that for the last month I've been coming up to speed with a camera that has......no eye level viewfinder. It's a Samsung NX 300. And in the spirit of total disclosure I must state that the camera was sent to me by the folks at Samsung for free. They have given me the camera. The tenuous string they attached (but without a legally binding contract...) was a request that I post 4 images a week to their Facebook page between now and September. Considering that I tend to shoot four images in any given hour of the day I thought it would be an easy mark to achieve. 

My finder prejudice made me a bit reticent to accept the offer but only a fool turns down a free camera with lots of potential so I decided to put aside my own self induced moratorium re:  this class of camera and give it the old college try (but without the faculty politics).  Long story short the casual viewfinder style of shooting is so different and even purging to me that this has become my de facto carry around camera. While it might have seemed churlish and challenging for me to bring my full frame Sony cameras to Chris Archer's grand video project it seemed natural for me to bring along a small and inoffensive, tourist-style camera with which to capture behind the scenes images. And  truth be told it was remarkable facile to use in the low light and dusty environment. Since I have only the kit lens I wasn't about to change lenses with the sand flying around and I found two ways to hold the camera (by using tension on the neckstrap) that allowed me to hold the camera without much shake at all.

What initially drew me to use the camera more and more were the very clean files and the very neutral look of the color. Very nice files with a high degree of sharpness. The second thing that cemented my daily, casual use of the camera is its innocuous look. While it's nicely designed it does scream "consumer product" in its very contenance. 

On my first outings in bright sun I had all the viewing problems I'd anticipated, the screen was all but invisible to me without prodigious efforts to screen it with my hands, black baseball cap, part of an discarded garbage bag. As a result I started taking a large Hoodman loupe around with me when I knew I'd be shooting in the sun. The other detriment to anyone in my age group will be your ability to focus on the screen with acuity. I can do it well enough for casual images but I work better if I stick a pair of reading glasses in my pocket as an assist. Now that I do that I've started to leave the training wheels (the loupe) at home and work with more confidence in the field. It may also be that I've narrowed down the feature set I like to work with and don't need to hit the menu as often.


The fruits of my labors...

Now I'm comfortable using the camera like a hipster. Eventually I'll find a small screen protector that folds out and shades the screen a bit. I'll keep the glasses at hand. But it all started me thinking today as I was reviewing images I'd been making with the camera. Beyond my own weaknesses (proximate vision) what was at the heart of my prejudice against using the camera in this fashion?  Afterall, I'd spent the better part of 20 years staring down into a reversed, ground glass screen on my Hasselblad (the big difference being that the H-Blad screen was much darker, much less resolved and much harder to see without popping up the magnifier and essentially sealing off the viewing system from outside light). And it was the same manner of viewing for the many Rolleiflex and Mamiya twin lens cameras I owned and used promiscuously over the years...

So really, all the Samsung NX 300 needs to make me love it without conditions is the equivalent of the Hasselblad waistlevel finder with pop up maginifier that worked so well for so long.

Once I jump that hurdle there is really nothing I like less about this camera's interface or image quality than what I get with my Sony Nex cameras. In fact, the menu in this camera is much, much cleaner and better! The images are different. The Sony's seem to have a bit more color and tonal bite than the Samsung but the Samsung files are more open and don't have an oppressive or heavy feel to the colors.

Here's something I didn't expect when using the rear screen...I've reverted to a much more careful compositional rigor than I employ when I use an eye level composition method. Much more rigorous! I look for the out of focus stuff in the background and I'm much more aware of juxtapositions of shapes and people. I'll admit it, I'm kind of hooked. 

Note to Samsung: Send me a couple more bodies and three or four juicy lenses and I'll trade you for my Nex stuff. I'm learning a new way to shoot and, yes, I could do the same with the screens on the back of the Sony's but I have to do it this way with the Samsung. Maybe I needed to be pushed more...

At any rate the Samsung is a hands down winner in my book and I'm adjusting quickly to my hipster/dirty baby diaper camera hold....well as much as I can. I still look around to make sure no "real" photographers are around before I do it. Old habits and pretensions die hard.

Kirk Tuck tries the "retro" setting and is mildly pleased.

Ahhh. Caffee Medici. A variation from coffee on a hot summer afternoon. Loving the out of focus areas in the background.

Muted color and long dynamic range means lots of room to play in post...

It's Friday morning and I'm procrastinating because I have two writing assignments due by the end of the day. I'll make it.  By the skin of my teeth....

6.19.2013

More water under the bridge. Hello to 14,000,000 pageviews.


Seems Zany Crazy to Me But We Just Crested the Fourteen Million Mark for Pageviews here at the Visual Science Lab. We've given Kirk Tuck (creative content creator, photographer and writer) a few hours off and we'll let him start his late night shift a few hours later than usual to mark the milestone.

We have some interesting news coming up later in the Summer about online education. Stay tuned for the announcement in the late, sizzlely part of the Summer. We're in massive pre-production at this point. Maybe that's why Kirk seems a bit scattered and more prone to write in the third person...

Let him know that 14 million pages eyed is no mean feat by writing him a random comment below. He'll appreciate it at five when we give him his cup of instant, decaf coffee, an old donut and his assignment for the day tomorrow. Every little bit helps.


Wild, massive, fun, scary, edgy creative projects help keep everyone on their toes and force you to learn new things.


A construction inside an old airplane hanger at Meuller Airport.

I have a friend that I met through swimming named, Chris Archer. He's an awesome former UT swimmer and all around good guy and he's been working as a photographer for the last few years. I used him as an assistant on a food shoot for a major hotel last year and really liked his personality and his work ethic, so when he asked me if I would help him with a complex video project I was pleased to say, "yes."

Chris is relatively new to video and up until recently most of his shoots have been done with a Nikon D800, and mostly handheld. But Chris is a disciplined professional who can jump into new stuff and study it deeply.  Chris teamed up with a modern dancer named Amy to brainstorm a really cool video project that would be a gem in each of their portfolios. Amy created a dance that takes place on a field of sand, against a curtain of falling sand, set against limbo black and Chris created a way to shoot that creative construct with fine control and very high production value.

This is the basic set construction. The wooden structure provides a place from which to 
pour sand and anchor our black background. Note the two troughs for sand that radiate out from the center point, near the top of the structure.

The project required about two tons of sand and a lot of lifting. Inside each trough, in separate compartments, are electric sanders that provide vibration to even out the distribution of sand. The construction of the super structure took the entire day, last Sunday. Once the structure was finished we tested it and fine-tuned the flow of sand. 

Then Chris was able to bring out his camera and start figuring out where the edges of the frame were and how to set up to take advantage of the confines of the set. I got busy lighting stuff. I brought along my gray case full of grip gear in order to safely and securely set up lights overhead. We knew we wanted a soft, overhead light for our main camera work so we settled on a Chimera Pancake, with skirt. We attached it to the safety rail of the structure, right over the spot in which Amy would be dancing. The light source inside the Chimera Pancake was a 1,000 watt mogul bulb (big ass tungsten).

Chimera Pancake Lantern with skirt for blocking off spill light and directing illumination into a smaller circle.

If you look at the image below you'll see a rare example of my attention to both safety and detail. I needed the light to be at least two feet out from the support in order to hit the "sweet spot" of the dance set below so I used one Super Clamp to attach my rig to the 2x4" board. The rig consisted of a Super Clamp, holding a Manfrotto Magic Arm, connected to a stand adapter and then to the light. You can see a second Super Clamp near the bottom of the frame with a wire attached. I have a tether wire running to both the Magic Arm and to the speed ring of the light itself. This way, if anything chooses to detach itself, all the materials would be caught by the tether wires instead of raining down on dancer or crew. Safety first with overhead instruments.

A view of the Magic Arm and its safety harness.

All the principal photography was done with the new, Sony F55 camera which shoots in uncompressed 4k, uses a full frame sensor, and was set up with a PL lens mount. We used Zeiss Super Speed Cine Primes for the entire project. Chris's choice of lenses was the 35mm t-1.5, the 50mm t-1.5 and the 85mm t-1.5, and yes, they are worth the cost. Each of the lenses was amazingly sharp at its widest aperture. Sharp in a way that very few camera lenses I've played with really are. The camera is not light at 13.5 pounds and gets incrementally heavier with every attachment one adds. Like high performance battery packs and one of the most detailed EVF finders I've ever looked through. Interested in the F55? Look at one here. Sony made this camera for people (Hollywood) who want to make feature films.


Sony F 55 on Sachtler sticks with Zeiss Super Speed lens.

As you can imagine, we all worked hard at keeping sand off the camera and especially out of the optical pathway. I didn't try to take any still shots with it but I'd guess with the huge pixel wells on a full frame, 8 megapixel sensor, the low light shots would be amazing. Interesting fact: the native ISO on the camera (base ISO sensor sensitivity) is 1250. But the camera is nothing without the idea and the nuts and bolts production.

By Monday Afternoon we had thirty feet by nine feet of black flocked material stapled into place
and the volunteer crew was loading up the sand troughs and filling up the dance area.

Volunteering to help Chris and Amy with their project was an good move for me. We got to try out lots of things I haven't done before in a shoot. And helping them with their creative project reminded me of the enormous value of shooting for yourself; following your own creative muse with a disregard for cost and time. Getting things right because you want them to be right, not because you need to get paid. I think the process of self-assigning kicks up the creative juices to a higher level because your audience is so much more discerning and, at the same time, less compromising. The cost of a project like this? I'll estimate just the rentals and raw materials at about $ 6,000. Time is a whole different matter. This is not a Kickstarter project or a project funded with other people's money. This was a project that Amy and Chris did because they had a vision and wanted to see it through without compromise or distraction. 

Chris and Amy did about two weeks of planning and preproduction for the shoot. The stage assembly, video shooting and set tear down was four, twenty hour days in an airplane hangar with no air conditioning or amenities. In Texas. In the Summer. The edit will probably take weeks of time. Do the rest of us have the same commitment to creating our own art? It humbles me and makes me think that I'm just playing around at being a creative person sometimes. Working on a project like this (as a volunteer) kicks your ass in a number of ways. First, you want to make sure your friend is able to achieve the vision he had when he started. That should be a matter of pride for any volunteer. Second, you are learning by example how to be "all in" for a project. Chris and Amy sweated every detail and spent an incredibly concentrated amount of time during the actual shooting. No breaks for play-off games on TV (what a crappy waste of precious time that would be). No end of day re-caps at the local watering hole. Just work until you get "it."

Finally, they show me by example what it takes to make a vision not only come alive but to do it in a way that faithfully captures the initial dream. Not "good enough" but exactly "what I saw in my mind's eye."


This is the incredibly talented Amy. No Diva here. She hauled sand, carried in drinking water and repeated tough motions over and over again for the camera. Graceful as they come but also tough as nails...

At one point we needed to go harder and stronger with the lighting. So we did.

We were shooting some footage for slow motion and needed some extra light power for the exposure. We decided on a bare Arriflex 1000 watt open face fixture with barndoors and used the rudimentary controls to tighten the beam a bit. We also added a front fill light which was an Arriflex 650 watt open face fixture in a Chimera video softbox with a 3/4 stop front diffuser. You'll notice our black Westcott FastFlag running interference between the fill light and the left side of the set. We wanted to keep as much light as possible off the black.



Amy Smoothing the Sand Before a Take.

The view above gives you an idea of how our light ended up looking for the slow motion sequences. You can get away with a harder light on video since your subject is in constant motion.
Chris operates the ten foot jib. 

On Tuesday morning we broke out the ten foot jib and assembled it. The jib comes packed in pieces in rigid travel cases and sometimes feels as though it requires a degree in mechanical engineering for assembly. Fortunately Chris had the foresight to ask the rental house here in Austin (GEAR) to show him the set up procedure, and while they took him through the steps he documented each one on his iPhone. Major plus for us. We stuck the Sony F 55 on one end and just about 90 pounds of counterweights on the other end. Along with the internal slider weight we were able to achieve a totally neutral balance. You could operate the whole rig with one finger (if you were brave enough to do so with a camera that's more expensive than my car at the other end...)
The Camera at the end of the ten foot jib. Chris was as smooth an operator on his first go around as I've seen with seasoned pros.

I'm a real baby where safety and expensive gear are concerned so you can see in the image above that I've insisted on safety tethering the camera unit to the super-structure of the jib. I didn't want the camera to come loose and fall on Amy or into the sand pile. It never budged but I'm paranoid enough to think that something might have happened if I'd had the hubris NOT to tether the camera.  The purple cord is to the LCD monitor at the back of the jib that allows Chris to move the massive arm with assurance.

Amy during a take with sand falling and camera moving smoothly.
Chris operating the boom while monitoring the frame in the small monitor on the end of the arm.

While we had missteps and false starts and issues with every imaginable part of the project Chris and Amy were able to problem solve, resolve and move on with the performance and filming with a discipline and endurance that was astounding. I saw a lot of the footage as we were shooting and lighting and I'm very excited about the project. I can hardly wait for the weeks it will take to edit, and then edit some more, and then finally put it into a form I can watch from head to tail. I already know it will be amazing. Chris has definitely stepped up to the creative challenge of high production motion and made some great art. One showing at the right agency and he'll be moving into the role of director in no time.

I was happy to be a small part of the crew. It made me think. It made me work with some new passion and it made me reflect. That's a lot to get in return for volunteering.


 I love this last shot because it shows off the use of the boom (jib) and divides the frame in a nice, offset diagonal with the triangle of the slightly offset hangar door echoing the white glow of the hot light on the set. Note the black flag to the side of the soft box to keep light off the black set wall. Note also the equipment case that gives Chris a safe spot to "land" the jib between shots. It all seems so cool.

P.S. All of my "behind the scenes" shots were made with the Samsung NX 300 camera and kit lens.